On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:21:45AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > >> So we should probably do one or both of: >> >> 1. Make an --allow-any-name option to mailinfo, and use it when we >> invoke mailinfo internally for rebasing. That still doesn't solve >> the emailed patch problem, but at least keeps purely internal >> operations sane. > > So I wrote up a nice tidy patch series with mailinfo changes and tests, > and then am/rebase changes and tests on top of that. And guess what I > noticed? My rebase tests didn't actually fail with stock git. > > I bisected to 43c2325 (am: use get_author_ident_from_commit instead of > mailinfo when rebasing, 2010-06-16), which was written to handle exactly > this sort of thing. > Heh, same story bro :( Just for reference, my patch can be found at http://repo.or.cz/w/git/kusma.git work/rebase-keep-name -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html