Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 07:23:29PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Thanks for your ACK and for the explanation.
>> >
>> > My last patches to git were blame related so semi-intuitively I knew
>> > that invalid sha1 are coming from files in worktree. Your description
>> > makes things much more clear and I'd put it into patch log as well.
>> > What is the best practice for this? For me to re-roll, or for Junio to
>> > merge texts?
>>
>> Re-rolling to explain changes in your own words is preferred; thanks.
>
> I see, thanks.
>
> I'm not that familiar with git internals involved, so here is updated
> patch with added paragraph about "df->sha1_valid=0 means files from
> worktree with unknown sha1", and appropriate excerpt from Jeff's post.
> That's the most reasonable I could come up with.
>
> Thanks,
> Kirill
>
> P.S. please don't forget to pick patch 1 which is unchanged.
Here is how I would describe it.
commit 87bb04bb760659dd33d7a173333329cd900620a9
Author: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat Dec 18 17:54:12 2010 +0300
fill_textconv(): Don't get/put cache if sha1 is not valid
When blaming files in the working tree, the filespec is marked with
!sha1_valid, as we have not given the contents an object name yet. The
function to cache textconv results (keyed on the object name), however,
didn't check this condition, and ended up on storing the cached result
under a random object name.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html