Re: Intermittent failures in t9119

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>  (2) Nobody uses the value from "Text Last Updated" field in practice, so
> >>      that bug has been unnoticed so far;
> >> 
> >>  (3) And it is not worth fixing it ;-)
> >> 
> >> For now, I would suggest fixing the failing test to ignore the "Text Last
> >> Updated" field while comparing, and if somebody is inclined to, we would
> >> update the code to match what "svn info" does.
> >
> > Agreed on both points.  I consider "git svn log" and "git svn info" to
> > be reasonable approximations of svn behavior, not exact replicas.
> > Exactly matching would be extremely difficult given variations between
> > different svn versions, and also svn requiring network access while
> > git svn does not.
> 
> Ok, here is a minimum patch to do that.

> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx>

-- 
Eric Wong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]