Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #01; Sat, 4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:39:54 +0900
Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Yann Dirson <dirson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Seen that argument before.
> > 1. does anyone care ? (I personally don't)
> 
> If nobody cared, you wouldn't get an argument.

OK, I can hear that - but well, noone complained till now that
--find-copies-harder would sound like "an action to be performed
_instead_ of some normal processing".


But most importantly, I don't get much feedback on the direct
implication of that choice: are we going to have 2 exact synonyms
(--find-copies-harder and --detect-copies-harder) forever, and to what
extent (see prev. mail about completion) ?

In the end, I still think the implications for the usability are what
matters, more than arguing about a subtle nuance of vocabulary.

-- 
Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]