Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #01; Sat, 4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:13:46 +0900
Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yann Dirson <dirson@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > But then, why not simply use --find-renames (since --detect-renames
> > has luckily not been released ontl the masses yet), and avoid
> > making similar-usage opts dissimilar and then adding a synonym just
> > to make them similar the other way ?
> 
> "Find" and "detect" have different nuances.
> 
> "Detect" sounds somewhat passive/minor, so "detect renames" makes it
> more clear that renames are detected _in addition_ to normal
> processing.

Seen that argument before.
1. does anyone care ? (I personally don't)
2. whether we care or not we have IMHO to face the implications, see my
other mails about implications of both paths

-- 
Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]