On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy venit, vidit, dixit 17.11.2010 12:43: >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Joshua Jensen wrote: >>> >>>> I'm curious as to why 'git rebase -m' isn't the default and what the >>>> real difference is between 'git rebase' and 'git rebase -m'. >>> >>> git rebase is faster. :) >> >> Perhaps a config option to let people to default to -m. Or perhaps >> they can just make an alias. >> >> By the way, can we make rebase even faster? Rebasing ~20 patches or >> more seems slow to me. I don't know much how patching works though. > > git sequencer... Sequencer is definitely an improvement. But does it improve performance? I don't know rebase internals but I think that it needs to update worktree/index for every commit, which might slow things down a bit. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html