Re: Difference between 'git rebase' and 'git rebase -m'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy venit, vidit, dixit 17.11.2010 12:43:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Joshua Jensen wrote:
>>
>>> I'm curious as to why 'git rebase -m' isn't the default and what the
>>> real difference is between 'git rebase' and 'git rebase -m'.
>>
>> git rebase is faster. :)
> 
> Perhaps a config option to let people to default to -m. Or perhaps
> they can just make an alias.
> 
> By the way, can we make rebase even faster? Rebasing ~20 patches or
> more seems slow to me. I don't know much how patching works though.

git sequencer...

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]