On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:31:33AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Hmmm, all calls to add_rejected_path() seems to be with ce->name as the > path parameter, Yes. All of them except for the leading path checks I introduced recently. In that code path we have to report untracked files which do not have a corresponding index entry. > That is true but I wonder if the order should be "whatever the processing > order happens to be" in the first place, as this is a report to the end > user, no? Perhaps "collect in strlist, sort at the end before showing" is > a more desirable thing to do? Is the order of processing not alphabetic? It is at least in the tests that I touched. Clemens
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature