Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > In the absence of programming errors, should all git command support > <tree>:./<path> syntax to name an object, or are there cases where the > relative does not make any sense? > > What I am trying to get at is that if this is diagnosing a user error, or > if this is showing that the mechanism to implement the relative path is > unnecessarily hard for the programmers to misuse. The mistake should be obvious from the context, but I wanted to say with the last sentence "the mechanism is too hard for the programmers to use and easy to make mistakes." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html