Re: [PATCH 1/2] add support for the SUA layer (interix; windows)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Markus Duft <mduft@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 10/29/2010 02:50 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> mduft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> [snip]
>> 
>> It would be much nicer to do this:
>> 
>>         #ifdef NO_INITGROUPS
>>         #define initgroups(x,y) (0) /* nothing */
>>         #endif
>> 
>> near the beginning of the file.  That would make life of people who have
>> changes in flight that would touch the same area of the code a lot easier.
>
> ok, i see the point, thanks for your suggestion! I'll change this.
>
> may i ask where i should send v3 of the patch so it gets processed further?
> just the ml again, or is there a specific maintainer i should send this to?

If your v3 will be different from your v2 with only that change, there is
no need to resend.  Please check what I queued in 'pu'---it has the above
fix already squashed in.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]