Re: [PATCH 00/11] More consistant terminology ("remote-tracking branch", "not updated")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 18:31 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Following the discussion in
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/159287/
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/159287/focus=159288
> 
> this is an attempt to be more consistant in the terminology used in Git.
> 
> The first patch fixes git status's "changed but not updated", and the
> rest tries to use "remote-tracking branch" consistantly. This
> essentially changes the doc, and also does slight modifications to the
> code. This changes error message, and maybe more controversially the
> generated merge messages (in a separate patch in case this is too
> controversial).
> 
> I've tried splitting this into systematic changes to ease review, but
> patches should be applicable in any order (i.e. Junio: if you find
> some of the patches good and uncontroversial, you can pick them
> right away).
> 
> Patch "user-manual.txt: explain better the remote(-tracking) branch
> terms" comes last, and adds a few sentences to make the distinction
> between remote, remote branch, remote-tracking branches explicit.
> Hopefully, this should avoid future users to have the same
> difficulties as Thore ;-).
> 
> The last 2 patches are minor things I noticed while going through the
> docs, but are essentially unrelated.
> 
> I'll be busy next week, so if anyone else wants to pick this patch
> serie and update it according to list review, he's welcome. Otherwise,
> it may have to wait.
> 
> Matthieu Moy (11):
>   Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status
>   Remplace "remote tracking" with "remote-tracking"
>   Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places
>   Change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch"
>   Change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch" in C code
>   Change incorrect uses of "remote branch" meaning "remote-tracking"
>   Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C
>     code
>   Use 'remote-tracking branch' in generated merge messages
>   user-manual.txt: explain better the remote(-tracking) branch terms
>   git-branch.txt: mention --set-upstream as a way to change upstream
>     configuration
>   git-http-push.txt: fix typo (branch -> branches)

I'm going to apply these to a branch of mine to see how they read in
context before I come to any definite conclusions. So far I like what I
see for the most part.

-- 
-Drew Northup N1XIM
   AKA RvnPhnx on OPN
________________________________________________
"As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?"
-John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]