Re: [PATCH 00/11] More consistant terminology ("remote-tracking branch", "not updated")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> this is an attempt to be more consistant in the terminology used in Git.
>>
>> Thank you very much for your work!
>
> Yes, seconded!  

Actually, I did the easy part ;-) (easy grep-able patterns, and
uncontroversal solution).

There's still a mess about the "upstream/downstream" Vs
"remote-tracking" terminology, both in the UI (--track options here
and there) and the doc.

And I'd really like the "index/cache/stage" thing to be fixed too. I
like "stage/staging area" best, but it seems this part does not make a
consensus (yet?).

I'm just hoping I gave the right example and someone else will now
take care of these two ;-).

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]