Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> --- a/t/t1509-root-worktree.sh >>> +++ b/t/t1509-root-worktree.sh >>> @@ -232,8 +232,8 @@ say "auto bare gitdir" >>> >>> # DESTROYYYYY!!!!! >>> test_expect_success 'setup' ' >>> - rm -rf /refs /objects /info /hooks >>> - rm /* >>> + rm -rf /refs /objects /info /hooks && >>> + rm /* && >> >> I'm worried that this would fail: >> >> $ mkdir foo >> $ cd foo >> $ >bar >> $ mkdir baz >> $ rm * >> rm: cannot remove `baz': Is a directory >> $ echo $? >> 1 > > How about replacing the two rm commands with a simple 'rm -rf /*'? How would "rm -rf /*" that will remove /bin/sh and /usr/bin/git among other things would possibly help? Isn't this test about having a minimum chroot with /bin, /usr populated with minimum git (and presumably shell tools) and for whatever sick reason have a bare git repository at /? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html