Re: [PATCH] t7003: Use test_commit instead of custom function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 15:44, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 15:24, Brian Gernhardt
>> <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > In addition, why do we need a custom make_commit when we have
>> > test_commit in test-lib.sh?
>>
>> It was added in v1.5.3-rc0~69^2~10 by Johannes Schindelin (CC'd). It's
>> probably just now-needless duplication, but I haven't familirized myself
>> with the code.
>
> Yep, I did not make a cleanup patch after adding test_commit. Neither did
> I consolidate other cases in t/ where the steps are done explicitly.

Thanks. I didn't check when test_commit was added, it makes sense now.

There's a lot of old spiderwebs like that in t/* that could now use
cleanup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]