Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Instead of
>
> (echo y; echo n; echo n) | git checkout -p HEAD^ -- dir
>
> write
>
> printf "%s\n" y n n |
> git checkout -p HEAD^ -- dir
>
> which means the same thing but might be easier to read.
I'm indifferent about this. It does save a process, but (maybe that's
just me though) I had to look up a POSIX manpage to verify that the
repeating behaviour is guaranteed.
> While at it, add a missing && to the "git checkout -p HEAD with change
> already staged" test.
Good catch.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html