Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Use "&iquot;" Latin 1 entity ("¿" -- inverted question mark =
> turned question mark, U+00BF ISOnum) instead '?' as replacements for
> control characters and other undisplayable characters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx>
Do you have something against our Spanish and Latin American
friends? ;-)
I wonder if there is a more suitable replacement character that
is accepted across scripts?
Japanese printing industry has a long tradition of using U+3013
("geta") as a filler character. Originally they placed a type
of otherwise unused character upside down while packing types
into a row, and the reverse side of a type, when inked and
printed, left imprint that looked like footprint somebody who
wore a "geta" (a traditional footware) would leave.
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%8B%E9%A7%84
shows how a "geta" looks like, and
http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U3000.pdf
shows how the filler character looks like.
Note that I am not suggesting to use ௅ as a replacement at
all. I however think inverted question is inappropriate, and we
should pick something else if we are fixing the question mark
which is obviously inappropriate.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html