Heya, On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 03:47, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sverre Rabbelier writes: >> I don't agree, imagine implementing hg-remote-svn (or the conceptual >> equivalent at least), it would require the same functionality, yes? >> You need to retrieve something from fast-import that you previously >> gave it. > > Ah, yes. I didn't think of that. If fast-import is already mature, > it's probably a good idea to design a new protocol altogether based on > this and not call it fast-import? That's not what I meant at all. We should still use fast-import, we should just design this extension to the fast-import protocol in such a way that it would also be useful when implementing something like hg-remote-svn ;). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html