On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> Here's a useful Wikipedia guideline: assume good faith: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith > > For the dear love of God. > > Just assume -- hypothetically -- for one second that you, Felipe > Contreras, tried to create a user page on > http://subversion.tigris.org/wiki/ reading like this: > > -- snip -- > Felipe E. Contreras, a proud Git user. > > * [http://felipec.wordpress.com/ Felipe Contreras] > ** [http://felipec.wordpress.com/tag/git/ Keep an open mind] > ** [http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/ Git is better] > -- snap -- > > only that the last link was to one of your blog posts and was not well > researched. > > If you still think that such a completely unbiased and uncontroversial > user page was a good idea, That's a straw man fallacy. What I think is a good idea to have in a wiki is irrelevant; we are talking about how to deal with (apparently) unwanted content coming from good faithed user. Banning right away without warning, nor guidelines is *definitely* not the right thing to do. > well, you should take over the monitoring of > the Git Wiki, I guess, and make sure you remove all link spam. Actually, I > like that idea. Can you do that, please? Can you watch the recent changes > of the Git Wiki and keep it a place where information is king? Thank you > so much in advance! Yes, give me the admin rights, my user is 'Felipec'. Apparently this is the only way to get rid of spam false positives. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html