Kris Shannon <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 31 July 2010 23:56, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 15:24, Matthieu Moy >> <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > >> >>> The name of the command may be subject to discussions. I've chosen >> >>> "run", but maybe "shell" would be OK too. In both cases, it doesn't >> >>> allow the one-letter version since both "r" and "s" are already used. >> >> >> >> "exec" with one-letter "x"? >> > >> > Thanks, that sounds good, yes. Any other thought? >> >> I like "exec". > or (t)est. testing is one possibility, but you may want to do other things, like pick <commit> ... exec perl -pi -e 's/foo/bar/g' file.c; git add file.c; git commit --amend or whatever. "exec" is definitely the best proposal. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html