On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 02:44:50PM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 08:00:04PM +0200, Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 2010.07.07 17:05:45 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > See how the security/manager/ssl/public/nsIBadCertListener.idl file that > > > > was created by the original patch is created as > > > > xulrunner/examples/simple/content/contents.rdf. > > > > > > The "problem" is that nsIBadCertListener.idl wasn't actually created by > > > the cherry-picked commit, but was modified. It was an empty file before, > > > created in 4292283190983fa91b875e22664a79a3aa9ea45d. > > > > > > And as nsIBadCertListener.idl is missing from the xulrunner/2.0 branch, > > > git does the usual rename detection, finding another empty file and ends > > > up patching that one instead. > > > > Oh, makes sense. Thanks. So that's a quite troubling corner case... > > I wonder if empty files shouldn't be special cased... > > Well, similarity score (of contents and of filename) is weighted by > contents length, but perhaps empty files / zero length somehow fall > out as an edge case... > > I agree that empty files should be special cased... unless filename is > _very_ similar. Question is, in a case like mine, what should the result be? Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html