On Monday 2006, October 23 20:33, Petr Baudis wrote: > Did the documentation ever get fixed or noone cared enough? ;-) My patch makes git-cherry match the documentation. Personally I think that the documentation is correct. git-cherry is, to me, terribly useful. I've got a few patches in my own branch and it's very useful to be able to check to see if those emailed patches have been accepted upstream with a simple git-cherry -v upstream Which makes it natural to see "-" = patch not in upstream "+" = patch in upstream I read the thread you pointed at, and didn't really understand what the downer on git-cherry was, or why the patch wasn't accepted. Have I misunderstood something? Andy -- Dr Andrew Parkins, M Eng (Hons), AMIEE andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpSsWOPPD80Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature