On 10/21/06, Sean <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:35:18 +0200 "Erik Bågfors" <zindar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So... I do agree that revnos might not fit perfectly in at all times. > But that they automatically mean that bzr is not a decentralized VCS, > I strongly disagree with. They are just one part of the equation. Whoe are you strongly disagreeing with? Nobody said it wasn't a decentralized VCS. But there is a _clear_ bias towards using it with a central server.
Ok, I take that back :) When I think "centralized" I think "everyone must commit to a central repository"... which is not what we are talking about here... /Erik ps. Sean, your mailer does something wierd with my last name in the to-field, so I can't just hit "reply" without removing my name first... /Erik -- google talk/jabber. zindar@xxxxxxxxx SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sip:17476714687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html