Re: Please default to 'commit -a' when no changes were added

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@xxxxxx> writes:
> You all say the index is such a great thing. So I might use it
> eventually. Other people might use it 1 out of 10 times. Yet other
> people use it 9 out of 10 times. Can you at least accept that the use of
> the index feature is different for each person?

In my case, I use the index extremely often, for complex commits that I
want to split up -- but I _also_ use "-a" maybe 30-40% of the time, for
simple commits that don't need splitting.

I think the "default to -a if index is empty and there are no args"
behavior sounds perfect.  It would have no real adverse effects as far
as I can see, and would make git a little more convenient for everybody.

-miles

-- 
I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono album; no rhyme
or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and then it's over.  --Ian Wolff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]