Re: [PATCH] Document ls-files -t as obsolete.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxx> writes:

> The behavior of "git ls-files -t" is very misleading (see
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/126516 and
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/144394/focus=144397
> for examples of mislead users) and badly documented, hence we point the
> users to superior alternatives.

I am no entirely happy with this patch.

If all your scripted Porcelain wants to see is "what are the paths I might
want to run 'git add' on?", you do not want to run diff twice (which is
what "status" does); you would say "ls-files -t -m -o --exclude-standard",
instead. The alternative is not even superiour in this case.

Having said that, I personally don't think of any other combination of
flags with which "ls-files -t" is useful.

If there are parts of the documentation that are misleading, perhaps that
is what your patch should be fixing instead, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]