On 10.04.2010 21:58 CEST, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>Am 10.04.2010 06:39, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>I used to religiously rebase slushy topics that are not in any stable
>>integration branches (we used to have only 'master' and 'pu'), and
>>
>> git rebase master foo
>> git rebase master bar
>> git rebase master baz
>>
>>was far easier to type than
>>
>> git checkout foo&& git rebase master
>> git checkout bar&& git rebase master
>> git checkout baz&& git rebase master
>
>I'm actually very glad that the current interface is the way it is -
>because it can do the rebase *without* the checkout. This way you can
>save a lot of recompilation due to changed timestamps if the topic is
>based on an old version.
>
>Only that some (all?) variants of rebase still unnecessarily do the
>checkout...
Is there any chance for merge to behave the same? I really like that I
don't have to do a checkout prior rebasing.
Thanks,
--
Michal Vitecek (fuf@xxxxxxxx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html