Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] JSON/XML output for scripting interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/04/2010, at 8:22, Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So, would it be worth providing a hint as to record type in the
output_start_object call so that if it was later desired to subsume
line-oriented formats under the same framework, there is enough
information available to the backend to do that?

Of course, one way to do this would be to use a more descriptive record name than "entry". This would make the record itself (as opposed to just it's fields) self-describing.

The point is, you would want to start using descriptive record names now so that you don't end up locked into a partially context sensitive base of consumers who are expecting their JSON records to be called "entry" and using context hints to infer the actual record type.

jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]