On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:34:13 +0200, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Heya, > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 19:30, Julian Phillips <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> you'll have to tell me what you think. > > The patch does look fairly simple, but I worry that not all commands > will be so simple, that is, they might not all have such an easy point > where you can hook in a different output method? Or am I seeing bears > where there are none? I think that there probably are commands where it will be more work to integrate the output - but I think that is probably more to do with the structure of the current code than the API of the new. Does it make a difference what the API of the new output code is if there isn't currently a sensible hook-in point? If code has been written without the expectation that the output format could be changed then the effort to add a new output format could be considerably more than for status or ls-tree. However, with the frontend/backend design hopefully we only have to endure the effort once to get multiple output formats. -- Julian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html