Hi, > While I fully share your > "cover-to-cover" concern, the current organization was chosen to minimize > such indirection. It is optimized for different audiences than we are (I > am also from "cover-to-cover" school) who want to pick only the pages > relevant to the task at hand. I am of the opinion that we can have both. Jonathan's document can be a more elaborate version of the standard urls.txt included in all these documents. I can see several usecases- for example, in documents like remote-helpers.txt, including a full section from urls.txt would be a bit of an overkill; we could include a reference to this document instead. Is redundancy an issue? We'd have to update both urls.txt and this document everytime we change something. -- Ram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html