[PATCH 4/5 v2] tag -v: Do not spawn a separate process for verify-tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Aside from handling of SIGPIPE, there was no reason for verify-tag
to run in a separate process.

Not much advantage to this I can see.  It just simplifies things
a little.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Rebased to remove the churn from patch 1, as suggested by Johannes.
Thanks.

The new series has only 4 patches:

  [PATCH 2/5] verify-tag: use sigchain library to block SIGPIPE
  [PATCH 3/5] Expose verify_tag()
  [PATCH 4/5 v2] tag -v: Do not spawn a separate process for verify-tag
  [PATCH 5/5] verify_tag_signature(): let caller look up tag object sha1

 builtin/tag.c |    6 +-----
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c
index 4ef1c4f..d138e0c 100644
--- a/builtin/tag.c
+++ b/builtin/tag.c
@@ -147,11 +147,7 @@ static int delete_tag(const char *name, const char *ref,
 static int verify_tag(const char *name, const char *ref,
 				const unsigned char *sha1)
 {
-	const char *argv_verify_tag[] = {"git-verify-tag",
-					"-v", "SHA1_HEX", NULL};
-	argv_verify_tag[2] = sha1_to_hex(sha1);
-
-	if (run_command_v_opt(argv_verify_tag, 0))
+	if (verify_tag_signature(sha1_to_hex(sha1), 1))
 		return error("could not verify the tag '%s'", name);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]