Re: About single user setup for lightweights

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> git sucks at handling large binary files (>50 megs or so) unless you
> have boatloads of RAM. If your binary files are moderately sized (a
> few megs) then it'll probably be reasonably efficient. I don't know
> about hg and bzr for memory usage.

Mercurial also uses lots of RAM, way more than I had hoped. I did some
tests with this recently:

  http://markmail.org/message/uxqtmmnkyimxse5b

They show a factor 3-6 blowup when working with a 256 MB file.

We don't really recommend storing such large files in Mercurial. Instead
we recommend storing the files outside of the tree, e.g., on a server
with a huge disk. The bfiles extension can do this:

  http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/BfilesExtension

-- 
Martin Geisler

Fast and powerful revision control: http://mercurial.selenic.com/

Attachment: pgpzB4gYW2c7i.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]