Re: "git stash list" shows HEAD reflog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 13.03.2010 22:21, schrieb Dave Olszewski:
> Maybe, although I'm not sure if dying here is the right behavior.  Is an
> empty reflog really an error?

Yeah, that might be a bit heavy-handed.  *ahem*

> I was testing a patch along the lines of
> what Vladimir proposed, which was simply to not set the default rev if a
> valid user-specified argument was found, whether or not it contains
> commits.

Sounds more like it.  How did the tests go?  Does it result in empty
output (which is what I would expect from an empty reflog, now that I
stopped and thought about it for a second)?

René
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]