Re: [git] Re: "git stash list" shows HEAD reflog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Ren? Scharfe wrote:

Am 12.03.2010 15:52, schrieb Vladimir Panteleev:

That doesn't explain why git displayed the HEAD reflog, though. That
seems to happen thanks to the check (revs->def && !revs->pending.nr) in
setup_revisions ("HEAD" is the default, as specified in the caller
cmd_log_init). It looks like (ideally) git shouldn't rely on whether
revs->pending is empty to decide whether to use the default, but rather
if a ref was specified by the user or not.

We could add some kind of check there, but with the patch applied I can't
trigger this second issue any more.  It would be nice to have a test script
along with such a sanity check.  Any idea how to cause this error, perhaps
with another type of invalid reflog file?

I actually noticed this last week.  You can reproduce it by doing "git
reflog" on a branch which has been idle for longer than the expiration.
Any 0-byte files in logs/refs/heads would give me this same behavior.

    Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]