Re: [PATCH 2/3] make union merge an xdl merge favor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> WIll do. On a side note: I plan to support the --union option also for
> git-checkout. Would that be a good idea?

What does it do?  Resolve conflicted paths using union merge at checkout
time?  That somehow feels like a dirty "because we can, and I only care
about union" hack to me.

I am mildly against "merge-file --union" in the first place.  The part I
actually liked in [2/3] was the removal of postprocessing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]