Re: [PATCH 2/3] make union merge an xdl merge favor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 21:15, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> The current union merge driver is implemented as an post process.  But the
>> xdl_merge code is quite capable to produce the result by itself.  Therefore
>> move to it there and teach git-merge-file a new --union option.
>
> I like the idea of patch 2 and 3 but they are independent of what we do
> (or don't do) to merge-file.  Could you flip the order of the patches so
> that 2 and 3 can go first?

WIll do. On a side note: I plan to support the --union option also for
git-checkout. Would that be a good idea?

Bert

>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]