Re: [PATCH 1/4] Refactoring: remove duplicated code from transport.c and builtin-send-pack.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:34:20PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > I can't remember the exact details of why the originals were not
> > removed, though (I think I complained about it once before, and there
> > was some technical reason, but I don't recall now). Daniel (cc'd) might
> > remember more.
> 
> Also the names of these functions probably need to be made more specific
> so that people not so familiar with the transport code can tell that they
> are from "transport" family.  The names didn't matter much while they were
> file scope static, but this series changes that.

Actually, I wonder if we can simply get rid of some of the calls in
send-pack. I think that the code in send-pack isn't even called anymore
via "git push"; it only gets called when you call send-pack directly.
And arguably send-pack as plumbing shouldn't be generating all sorts of
user-facing output. But it is a behavior change. I wonder if anybody
actually calls send-pack directly anymore. It seems like even scripts
use "git push" because of the transport agnosticism.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]