On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:05:18PM -0500, Jay Soffian wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Automatic cherry-pick failed. After resolving the conflicts,
> > mark the corrected paths with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'
> > and commit the result with:
> >
> > git commit -c HEAD~23
> >
>
> Blech, how is this an improvement? Why can't I just say "git
> cherry-pick --continue"?
Because nobody has implemented it yet. ;P
The two improvements here are:
1. We show what you typed as "git cherry-pick $X", so if you want to
re-type it, you know it is just "git commit -c $X". This is not
about speed, but about being more sensible for users to read.
2. The output is now cut-and-pasteable, so you don't have to type it
if it is still available in your terminal.
These were meant to make the situation better than it was; I agree that
"git cherry-pick --continue" would be better still.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html