Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Hmm. I was thinking "am" was the odd man out, but really there are only >> two sequencer commands that I noted: rebase and am. So you could perhaps >> argue that rebase should also learn "--resolved". Or am I forgetting >> one? Having said all I did in the previous message, I think "am --continue" would be a good addition. And "rebase --resolved" would not make any sense if the reason the control is given back to you was because you ran "rebase -i" and marked a commit to be "edit"ed. Of course, we could add "--resolved" and "--edited" (or perhaps "--amended") to "rebase", and have it make sure that the correct one is given. For example, when it stopped for "edit", it would reject "rebase --resolved". But I do not think it is worth the hassle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html