Hi, On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Jay Soffian wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Jay Soffian wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Johannes Schindelin > >> <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> (Here I'm setting GIT_EDITOR=true just to demonstrate that I didn't > >> >> change the list of commits in the latter case.) > >> > > >> > You can get _exactly_ the same behavior if you use -m. > >> > >> Or rather, -p. ;-) > > > > No. -p tries to preserve merges, and it will use > > git-rebase--interactive.sh for hysterical raisins. > > > > I meant -m. > > I don't understand what you mean by "_exactly_ the same behavior" then. Both "rebase -i" and "rebase -m" are really a cherry-pick in a loop. Ciao, Dscho