On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Jay Soffian wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Johannes Schindelin >> <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> (Here I'm setting GIT_EDITOR=true just to demonstrate that I didn't >> >> change the list of commits in the latter case.) >> > >> > You can get _exactly_ the same behavior if you use -m. >> >> Or rather, -p. ;-) > > No. -p tries to preserve merges, and it will use > git-rebase--interactive.sh for hysterical raisins. > > I meant -m. I don't understand what you mean by "_exactly_ the same behavior" then. "GIT_EDITOR=true git rebase -i" and "git rebase -p" both use git-rebase--interactive.sh, and so are exactly the same behavior. -m still uses git-rebase.sh, but calls merge instead of format-patch + am. Perhaps the end-result is the same, but the behavior is different. I guess I'm being a bit pedantic here, but I'm really just trying to understand what you mean. Thanks, j. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html