On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Eugene Sajine <euguess@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> As has already been pointed out, an extremely common workflow for "git >> commit --amend" is to include additional changes that were accidentally >> overlooked in the initial commit, and no changes are made to the commit >> message. >> >> Changing the behavior would break that perfectly reasonable, >> widely-practised workflow, and _that_ would be 100% not ok. > > I'm not against that workflow - I'm not forcing anybody to change the > commit message. The thing I'm talking about is roughly that it should > NOT treat the result of command ":q" the same way as the command > ":wq". > Quite a lot of text-editors on prevents a user from saving when the buffer is unchanged, so I don't think this would actually work. Keep in mind that vi is not the only editor one can use to edit commit messages. -- Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html