Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ron Garret <ron1@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The manual specifically contradicts you, so either you are wrong or the 
> manual is wrong.

In case you haven't noticed, Pasky is one of the old timers and he knows a
thing or two about the git's world model.

And I do not see a contradiction in what the manual describes and "a
branch is a named pointer to a commit" (although "named" can probably be
omitted as "unnamed pointer" is not useful at the UI level).



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]