Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ron Garret <ron1@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> For my rather fresh eye it looks more like unnamed (anonymous?) branch
>> than a temporary one. Doesn't detached HEAD behave exactly like a
>> regular HEAD but pointing to the tip of an unnamed branch?
>
> I strongly concur with this.
>
> And as long as I'm weighing in, it would also help to prevent confusion 
> if it were made clear that this unnamed branch doesn't actually come 
> into existence unless and until you do a commit.

This shows that you are still thinking a branch is a line (or multiple
lines).  It is not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]