On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > The patch itself to move add_files_to_cache() to builtin-add.c (or to its > own file) makes sense from the code placement POV, but if the goal is to > shrink the on-disk footprint, isn't an alternative approach be to make > hash-object built-in? You can lose the whole 1.7M from the filesystem > footprint that way, no? Sure. Except, as I mentioned, it's not just git-hash-object. It's _all_ of them. The total space savings wasn't 1.7M, it was 12M. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html