Re: [PATCH] post-receive-email: allow customizing of subject/intro/footer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> So, overall, why not make generate_email_header() be simply:
>> 
>> generate_email_header()
>> {
>> 	# --- Email (all stdout will be the email)
>> 	# Generate header
>> 	subst_vars <<-EOF
>> 	To: $recipients
>> 	Subject: ${emailprefix}${emailsubject}
>> 	X-Git-Refname: @refname@
>> 	X-Git-Reftype: @refname_type@
>> 	X-Git-Oldrev: @oldrev@
>> 	X-Git-Newrev: @newrev@
>> 
>> 	${emailbodyintro}
>> 
>> 	EOF
>> }
>> 
>> This would also let you simply subst_vars() so that it needn't support
>>  piped invocations, no?  (Not a very drastic simplification, but still...)
>
> if emailbodyintro is empty, this adds two useless newlines.  otherwise, this 
> would be fine i think.

I haven't looked at the original that is being improved upon (because I am
not very interested in this sample script myself), but I have two comments
on the above.

 - You can do something like this to fix that "empty line" issue, no?

	LF='
        ' ;# newline
	subst_vars <<-EOF
        ...

        ${emailbodyintro:+"$emailbodyinto$LF"}
	EOF

 - If you are using shell variable interpolation anyway, why do you still
   need @special_name@ interpolated with perl or sed or whatever you are
   using in subst_vars (which I didn't look at)?  If you have $refname,
   $refname_type and friends, can't the above become "cat <<-EOF"?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]