Re: Approxidate licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 13:39 -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> Would the three of you agree to license date.c under the LGPL or BSD? It 
> looks like you're the only authors of non-trivial changes [1]. And it seems 
> reasonable to want the date parsing thing under non-GPL terms outside of 
> git.

Yeah, LGPL and BSD are both fine by me -- although I don't actually
recognise much of my own code in there. 

Btw, why isn't the meaning of 'tea-time' properly modified according to
the locale?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]