Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > [1] git log and git blame are pretty impressive, but they don't quite > catch that most of date.c was written by David as part of commit-tree.c, > then Tony replaced it with a version that uses curl, then Edgar separated > it out into a date.c and simultaneously reverted Tony's changes. On the > other hand, the commit messages do say this, and you can use git log and > git blame to verify that they're true. The only thing they don't let > you verify is what the differences are between the date.c added in > ecee9d9e and the similar part of commit-tree.c in 812666c8. If someone > wants to make git blame *really* magic, date.c would be a good test case. That's good to know. I have in my head a super-duper blame that I outlined in my obituary for git-annotate, but that is still a vaporware and will continue to be for some time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html