Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Show project README if available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Luben Tuikov wrote:
--- Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
If the project includes a README file, show it in the summary page.
The usual "this should be in the config file" argument does not apply here
since this can be larger and having such a big string in the config file
would be impractical.

I don't know if this is suitable upstream, but it's one of the repo.or.cz
custom modifications that I've thought could be interesting for others
as well.

I don't see how a read-me file relates to gitweb.

People may call those files "00README" or "README.txt"
or "README.TXT" or "README_001", etc.

The contents of such a file has nothing to do with gitweb,
and or git.  It may work for repo.or.cz but is unlikely that
it would work for all projects for all git repos and for all
gitweb interfaces.


Well, git isn't the right tool for everything, and umbrellas are only good when it rains.

The contents of a read-me file could be quite large and thus
not suitable for the "summary" page.  Both the contents and the
size may not be suitable.  "repo.or.cz" is the exception, not
the rule.

A readme file isn't written with the intent of git or gitweb.
It is a function of the project, not the SCM used to keep it in, or
the SCM web interface used to show it.


I can quite clearly envision usage for a README file for gitweb exclusive usage; It would show a link to coding guidelines, email-addresses for mailing-lists and project maintainers, bugtracker urls and other things which are handy to find fast on the web but that you don't necessarily want to dig around inside the repo for.

the project-root/README usually holds info along the lines of
"This program is really spiffy. It does this, this and that, and if you configure it properly, it will Make the World a Better Place(tm)."; Too newbie'ish info for people looking to submit bugs, patches and suggestions.


I don't understand why the "description"  file doesn't do what
you want?  Do you need it to be multi-line or slightly larger?
Why not just extend "description" and/or create/use a second
file called "description_long" to store multi-line descriptions?


I imagine description_long is what's discussed here, although README is the suggested name.

Or why not extend the "description" file s.t. only the first
line would be shown in the "description" line of "summary" and
down below, show the rest of the description file if present?


Junio suggested this 2 hours before you sent your mail, and it seems as reasonable now as it did then. It also makes .git/description consistent with how we write and show commit-messages.

--
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]