Luben Tuikov wrote:
Do people have reason to favor annotate over blame? To keep
existing people's scripts working I think we should add a small
amount of code to blame.c to default to compatibility mode when
the command is called as git-annotate at least for a while, but
other than that I do not see much issue against scheduling for
annotate's removal.
+1. Although I would leave git-annotate in git, if only to meet
expectations of new git users.
I agree with Junio's assessment of the situation.
+1 -- I need to test that the switch to git-blame for git-cvsserver
works well for Eclipse end users. Will try and fit that next week
somehow ;-)
martin
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
OFFICE: +64(4)916-7224 MOB: +64(21)364-017
Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler - Einstein
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html