Re: perhaps time to remove git_blame from gitweb, and git-annotate?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear diary, on Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:13:15AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> said that...
> It's been a while since we lost git_blame from %actions list.  I
> am wondering maybe it's time to remove it, after 1.4.3 happens.

I will not mourn git-annotate disappearance (perhaps it could stay an
alias to git-blame -c; I don't like this UI-wise but we already do this
kind of thing with git-log / git-whatchanged). I still like gitweb blame
better than blame2 but I'll just patch blame to look like blame2 (or
better) and be happy with that.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]