Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 07:50:48PM +0900, Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
>> Quoting Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> > The reverse reference has long existed, and the autocrlf description
>> > was actually obsolete and wrong (saying only file content is used),
>> > not just incomplete.
>>
>> What do you mean by "reverse reference"?
>
> I'm refering to the fact that the "crlf" section of
> Documentation/gitattributes.txt mentions core.autocrlf,
> which is in the opposite (reverse) direction as this new reference
> I'm adding.
> ...
> Do I need to resubmit the patch, in order to rephrase the commit
> message?
Thanks; I heard you, as your response was Cc'ed to me as well ;-)
How about this? I didn't touch the patch text (other than dropping
trailing whitespaces).
commit ff68668695486b72b5f06146eddf85b70841088a
Author: Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat Nov 14 11:35:00 2009 -0700
core.autocrlf documentation: mention the crlf attribute
The description of the configuration variable is obsolete and
wrong (saying only file content is used), not just incomplete.
It has used the attribute mechanism for a long time.
The documentation of gitattributes mentions the core.autocrlf
configuration variable in its description of crlf attribute.
Refer to the gitattributes documentation from here as well.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html